Methodology Update Log — August 2026

Consolidated disclosure of the Environmental Intelligence Layer accuracy program · Batch release · Companion to the Validation Results report

What this document is. In August 2026 Orbyfy completed a systematic accuracy program across every analysis module in the Earthflow Physics AI™ pipeline. Where a value was wrong, we fixed it; where a value was an estimate, we labeled it; where a data source could not be reached, the platform now says so instead of substituting a guess. This log discloses every customer-visible change in one place. Each change was deployed individually, verified against a fixed 7-site reference harness before and after, and re-verified end-to-end across a 60-site portfolio covering all 48 continental states.

1 · Principles applied

Four rules governed every change:

1. Real data first. Every constant, threshold, and default now traces to an authoritative published source. Reasoned guesses were removed or explicitly labeled as engineering assumptions — never presented as data.

2. Never guess geography. The pipeline previously carried regional lookup shortcuts that defaulted unresolved locations to specific states. Location is now resolved once, authoritatively, per site; when resolution fails the affected output is labeled degraded — it is never silently assigned another state's values.

3. Honest failure. When an upstream source is unavailable, the affected fields now carry an explicit estimate/degraded status. A failed lookup can no longer masquerade as a successful determination.

4. Continental generality. Every fix applies identically at any coordinate in the lower 48; a standing 48-state verification suite runs before every release.

2 · Customer-visible value changes

Analysis areaWhat was wrongWhat changedTypical effect
Rainfall erosivity & erosion design A single state's erosivity baseline was silently applied at roughly 80% of sites; a synthetic latitude-band value participated in the precipitation average. State resolved authoritatively per site; synthetic input removed from every average. Erosivity corrected at previously mis-assigned sites (up to ~6× in the Northwest); arid-site precipitation no longer overstated; erosion-control recommendations re-rated accordingly.
Design-storm precipitation State-average storm coefficients were presented with point-query provenance and high confidence. Real per-site federal precipitation-frequency point estimates adopted for 46 of 48 states; the two Pacific-Northwest states outside that product's coverage are labeled as estimates with the reason stated. Design storms are now genuinely site-specific — for example, two same-state desert sites that previously showed identical values now correctly differ. Storm classes moved up at convective sites and down at desert sites.
Hail expected annual loss Every historical hail event was charged the break probability of the single largest stone on record — overstating expected loss 2–8×. Loss now sums each event's own fragility across the full historical size distribution. EAL corrected downward at every site — most at hail-belt sites. Relative site ranking preserved.
Flood determination A failed or rejected flood-map query silently reported "minimal-risk zone / high confidence"; an invented coastal zone could be substituted on error; an uncited regional multiplier (up to 2.1×) scaled the flood score. Three-way honesty: mapped-and-clear, genuinely unmapped ("no federal flood map exists here"), or unavailable — never a fabricated zone. The multiplier no longer touches the score. First verified positive floodplain determinations (coastal high-hazard zone with base flood elevation); scores re-based on evidence only — some rose (a mapped floodplain site was previously suppressed by the regional factor), some fell.
Lightning A ten-box regional table with an ordering defect under-read the desert Southwest ~2×; total lightning was also used where a ground-strike rate belongs. Full-resolution satellite optical lightning climatology bundled per-site; ground-flash conversion applied with a published continental ratio before any strike-frequency math. Flash density now continuous per site; strike-frequency and risk levels re-based (generally one tier lower — the old figures double-counted in-cloud flashes as ground strikes).
Wind design loads Published ultimate design speeds were multiplied by a return-period factor a second time, inflating every design pressure ~39% (up to ~90% inland of hurricane coasts, where an immediate-coast speed applied hundreds of km inland). Map speeds used as the ultimate values they are; hurricane speeds decay with real coastal distance; the site's measured multi-year wind record now participates — design speed is the greater of the code map and the measured extreme-value estimate. Design pressures reduced ~28% at most sites (to the code-book values); measured winds can only raise the basis, never lower it below code. Prior figures were conservative, not unsafe — but they inflated racking and foundation cost estimates.
Carbon offset An uncited base figure adjusted by a latitude rule labeled as a "regional carbon database" that did not exist. Site's modeled annual generation × its regional grid marginal-emissions rate (the published basis for avoided-emissions from new renewables), resolved per site. Genuine regional dispersion (roughly 800–1,250 tons CO₂/MW/yr across the portfolio) replacing a near-flat guess; higher where solar displaces a more carbon-intensive marginal mix.
Solar performance physics The bifacial-gain and cell-temperature models were correct but never received their real inputs — a uniform 7.14% gain and a fixed wind assumption applied everywhere. Per-site satellite surface albedo, real annual temperature, and the site's measured mean wind now feed the models. Bifacial gains now range ~4.8–8.5% by site; capacity-factor adjustments genuinely site-specific.
Frost & winter severity State assignment by coordinate boxes misfired (one Midwest site read "unknown," one Southwest site read a neighboring state's value). Authoritative state resolution; plus a new sub-state winter-severity index interpolated from ~5,000 national climate stations, with a published bare-ground frost-penetration conversion emitted beside the code frost line (two distinct, labeled quantities). Code frost lines corrected at mis-assigned sites; new continental-resolution severity fields.
Permitting & jurisdiction Overlapping state boxes assigned the wrong regulatory regime near borders (e.g., a Nevada site shown under a California program); a wetland "coverage percent" was a feature count in disguise. Programs keyed by the authoritatively resolved state; wetland reporting states what was actually observed (feature count), with areal coverage marked not-computed. Correct state programs everywhere; no invented percentages.
Risk percentiles "Percentile" was a coarse fixed-threshold bin, not a rank. Each site now ranks within the real 60-site continental reference portfolio, with the basis stated in the field's metadata. Percentiles now mean what the word says.
Coverage boundaries Locations outside the continental U.S. ran the full analysis on continental fallback values and reported success. Non-continental coordinates are now rejected at the front door with an explicit coverage statement. No analysis is produced where the underlying data does not apply.

3 · Labeling & transparency changes

Beyond value corrections, the release standardizes provenance across all modules: estimate paths report Success_Estimate with a tier and a degraded flag rather than plain success; fields that cannot be computed say so; two per-process randomization defects that made identical sites return different values across runs were removed (outputs are now deterministic); and cost-model base rates are explicitly labeled as engineering assumptions pending citation.

4 · How every change was verified

Each change shipped as its own deployment with: an offline test of the changed computation against hand-verified values; a pre-written accepted-delta list; a before/after field-level diff across a fixed 7-site reference harness; targeted live probes of the specific new values; and a rollback point recorded (none was needed). The program closed with a 60-site end-to-end capture across all 48 continental states, physical-gradient checks (lightning, erosivity, and wind monotone along their physical axes), and a new per-module accuracy gate suite whose measured results — including the two open findings it currently flags — are published in the Validation Results report.

Our position  Several of these corrections reduced reported risk figures; several increased them. We changed them in both directions for the same reason: the number now reflects the authoritative source, measured at your site. Where our platform estimates, it says so; where data does not exist, it says that too.